Join date: Jan 14, 2022

The Question of the Primordial Ground of Being

Democrite assumed that being is not immobile. Instead, for him, being consists of an infinite number of atoms that move in space - my homework . To distinguish the atoms, he named characteristics of a quantitative nature: "They differ in shape, which is connected with size, in position and in arrangement." Furthermore, he was convinced that a force that causes creation and decay is unnecessary.

For the essential property of atoms is their mobility. In this, Democrite saw the mobility of atoms as a mere change of place and overlooked the fact that all bodies falling in the void have the same velocity - same day essay . But this means that the bodies do not change their position in relation to each other. A collision, a vortex or the concatenation of atoms was therefore not possible.

Democrite considered empty space as a prerequisite for the atoms to be able to move freely at all. Therefore, the atoms, which exist in infinitely large numbers - , must always be single and separate. Emptiness is responsible for this separation of the atoms from each other, which is thus also the condition for the movement of the atoms and is responsible for their diversity and singularity. Democrite referred to empty space as non-being. For him, being and non-being coexist and are unchanging. Only the concatenation of atoms can change, but not the atoms themselves or the emptiness. According to Democrite, emptiness is present to varying degrees in different things. According to this, soft things possess much emptiness and hard things little.

Useful Resources:


Natural numbers, axiomatic structure

Natural numbers, historical


Biochemistry history